Master fault tolerance#1
Closed
PDoakORNL wants to merge 13 commits into
Closed
Conversation
Contributor
|
test this please |
|
Can I test this patch? |
PDoakORNL
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2026
A non-existent output.directory previously surfaced only as a cryptic HDF5 crash. Add OutputParameters::validate(), called from Parameters::readInput on first rank only, which throws std::invalid_argument with a clear message naming the missing directory. Validation is kept separate from OutputParameters::readWrite so the parsing path stays disk-free and unit-testable; this also avoids needing the existing ReadAll fixture to point at a real path. Follow-up PRs for bugs #2–#4 are expected to add validate() to other parameter sections under the same convention.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Return of the master fault tolerance branch.
Speaking with @gbalduzz further on this he thinks we should decide what changes we need to put this in without a runtime switch since it greatly reduces how difficult to understand CUDA failures are.