feat(query): implements "Beta - SQL DB Instance Without Centralized Logging"#7785
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
…re_that_'cloudsql.enable_pgaudit'_database_flag_for_each_cloud_sql_postgresql_instance_is_set_to_on_for_centralized_logging
…16629_16_6.2_PostgreSQL_Database_ensure_that_'cloudsql.enable_pgaudit'_database_flag_for_each_cloud_sql_postgresql_instance_is_set_to_on_for_centralized_logging
cx-artur-ribeiro
previously approved these changes
Oct 31, 2025
cx-artur-ribeiro
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM! Nice job!
…re_that_'cloudsql.enable_pgaudit'_database_flag_for_each_cloud_sql_postgresql_instance_is_set_to_on_for_centralized_logging
|
| GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21271469 | Triggered | Generic Password | cf16128 | assets/queries/terraform/azure/unrestricted_sql_server_access/test/negative6.tf | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate this secret.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
cx-artur-ribeiro
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.








Reason for Proposed Changes
Currently there is no query to ensure that a "google_sql_database_instance" resource with a "POSTGRES" based "database_version" has the 'cloudsql.enable_pgaudit' flag enabled.
Quoting CIS_Google_Cloud_Platform_Foundation_Benchmark_v4.0.0 page 238: "
As numerous other recommendations in this section consist of turning on flags for logging purposes, your organization will need a way to manage these logs. You may have a solution already in place. If you do not, consider installing and enabling the open source pgaudit extension within PostgreSQL and enabling its corresponding flag of cloudsql.enable_pgaudit. This flag and installing the extension enables database auditing in PostgreSQL through the open-source pgAudit extension. This extension provides detailed session and object logging to comply with government, financial, & ISO standards and provides auditing capabilities to mitigate threats by monitoring security events on the instance."Proposed Changes
Implemented the missing query.
The query will flag for 4 separate instances : (all after ensuring "database_version" is POSTGRES based (possible values list))
Tenable reference
I submit this contribution under the Apache-2.0 license.