[Andrey170170]

Summary

On Android, the new-thread screen could open shifted down by about one header height, with the composer partly off-screen so you couldn't type. Re-picking the project fixed it.

The new-task routes showed the native header on first layout, and the screens hid it after mount. That's the same race pingdotgg#18963 fixed for detail panes with DETAIL_HEADER_OPTIONS. The fix hides the native header from the first layout on these routes:

 NewTaskSheetStack (apps/mobile/src/Stack.tsx)
   NewTaskDraft
+    headerShown: Platform.OS !== "android"
   NewTaskEnvironment
+    headerShown: Platform.OS !== "android"
   NewTaskBranch
+    headerShown: Platform.OS !== "android"

All three already draw their own AndroidScreenHeader. iOS is unchanged.

Evidence

• Before: device screenshot with an empty band above "New thread", the composer clipped at the bottom and no text input possible.
  After: not yet checked on a device. The fix will ship in the next Forgejo Android build for a device check. Mobile typecheck and lint pass.

Merge Danger

Door: two-way

Blast Radius: small

Only changes Android header options for three new-task routes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-21T22:50:46.400317Z	c40336a	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.config.ts
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Essentials
• Run ID: e8621cb2-edff-416a-b5ba-6bd293dff07d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a08aece and c40336a.

📒 Files selected for processing: 1

• apps/mobile/src/Stack.tsx

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. 0 included reviews remain after this review. Your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 1 review per hour.

📝 Walkthrough

The New Task draft, environment picker, and branch picker hide the native header on Android. On other platforms, these screens continue to show the native header.

Changes: Mobile Header Visibility

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Set header visibility by platform apps/mobile/src/Stack.tsx	The three New Task screens hide the native header on Android and show it on other platforms. The draft screen retains its hidden back button and empty title.

Priority: ➖ Normal

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Change: Bug fix

Suggested reviewers: juliusmarminge

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to c4033

The scoped Android header change has no established merge-blocking risk.

Pre-merge checks: 3 · 1

Failed checks: 1 warning

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check		The description explains the problem and implementation, but it does not use the required Problem, Change, Scope and approval, and Verification sections. It also lacks approval or an exemption rationa…	Rewrite the description using all required template sections. Add the triaged issue or maintainer approval, or explain why this obvious focused fix qualifies without one. Complete Android device verification and include before-and-after scr…

Passed checks: 3 passed

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check		The title clearly identifies the Android new-thread composer layout fix and matches the primary change.
Linked Issues check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description explains the problem and implementation, but it does not use the required Problem, Change, Scope and approval, and Verification sections. It also lacks approval or an exemption rationale and does not provide completed after-device evidence for the UI change.

Resolution

Rewrite the description using all required template sections. Add the triaged issue or maintainer approval, or explain why this obvious focused fix qualifies without one. Complete Android device verification and include before-and-after screenshots, plus a recording if interaction or layout timing requires it.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}