From ef1a83994df11dac5e27d09bf6c392941a5ace94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Schuller Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 05:28:37 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Addendum. --- src/donuts_labs_battery/evidence_drip_feed.md | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/donuts_labs_battery/evidence_drip_feed.md b/src/donuts_labs_battery/evidence_drip_feed.md index befc75e..d03c015 100644 --- a/src/donuts_labs_battery/evidence_drip_feed.md +++ b/src/donuts_labs_battery/evidence_drip_feed.md @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ Given this wording my take is that: no confirmation of weather VTT or Donut Labs prescribed which cell was used for which test. If Donut Labs made that pick, merely presenting the units ahead of time doesn't help the case. +Overall this test seems very clearly aimed at manufacturers who will have have concerns on what kind of cooling is +required to integrate a battery in their product. + ## Feb 23 2026 - Charging speed VTT report: [VTT_CR_00092_26.pdf](20260223_c_rate_heat_test/VTT_CR_00092_26.pdf)