Skip to content

Fix the action of a room key request cancellation. - #2247

Merged
turt2live merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
poljar/key_request_fix
Aug 26, 2019
Merged

turt2live merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
poljar/key_request_fix

Conversation

@poljar

@poljar poljar commented Aug 26, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The spec states that the action of a room key request cancellation
should be "cancel_request" but every known implementation uses
"request_cancellation" instead.

This patch fixes the spec to reflect the implementations.

The spec states that the action of a room key request cancellation
should be "cancel_request" but every known implementation uses
"request_cancellation" instead.

This patch fixes the spec to reflect the implementations.
@turt2live

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Is it possible to get a link to the implementations which do this?

@turt2live
turt2live self-requested a review August 26, 2019 14:19
@turt2live

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

also changelog please

@turt2live

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Just here - it's to prove that we aren't making claims that "implementation do this" without evidence.

@poljar

poljar commented Aug 26, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Is this considered a spec clarification or a breaking change?

@turt2live

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Clarification

@turt2live turt2live left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks!

@turt2live
turt2live merged commit 808eda4 into master Aug 26, 2019
poljar added a commit to matrix-nio/matrix-nio that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2019
The spec stated that a key request cancellation should have the action
"cancel_request" but riot and friends used "request_cancellation"
instead.

The spec will be changed to reflect the implementations so let us use
the "request_cancellation" action as well.

Upstream pull request: matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#2247
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants