ACPI: CPPC: Add support for CPPC v4

CPPC v4 (ACPI 6.6, Section 8.4.6) adds two optional entries to the
_CPC package:

1. OSPM Nominal Performance (8.4.6.1.2.6): A write-only register that
   lets OSPM inform the platform what it considers nominal performance.
   The platform classifies performance above this level as boost and
   below as throttle for its power/thermal decisions.

2. Resource Priority (8.4.6.1.2.7): A Package of Resource Priority
   Register Descriptor sub-packages that allow OSPM to set relative
   priority among processors for shared resources (boost, throttle,
   L2/L3 cache, memory bandwidth). Parsing the full structure is not
   yet supported; such entries are marked as unsupported.

Add v4 _CPC table parsing (25 entries) and update REG_OPTIONAL to
mark the two new registers as optional.

Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260527194626.185286-2-sumitg@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Author: Sumit Gupta

drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c

@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpc_desc *, cpc_desc_ptr);
  * cpc_regs[] with the corresponding index. 0 means mandatory and 1
  * means optional.
  */
-#define REG_OPTIONAL (0x1FC7D0)
+#define REG_OPTIONAL (0x7FC7D0)
 
 /*
  * Use the index of the register in per-cpu cpc_regs[] to check if
@@ -751,18 +751,19 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 	/*
 	 * Disregard _CPC if the number of entries in the return package is not
 	 * as expected, but support future revisions being proper supersets of
-	 * the v3 and only causing more entries to be returned by _CPC.
+	 * the v4 and only causing more entries to be returned by _CPC.
 	 */
 	if ((cpc_rev == CPPC_V2_REV && num_ent != CPPC_V2_NUM_ENT) ||
 	    (cpc_rev == CPPC_V3_REV && num_ent != CPPC_V3_NUM_ENT) ||
-	    (cpc_rev > CPPC_V3_REV && num_ent <= CPPC_V3_NUM_ENT)) {
+	    (cpc_rev == CPPC_V4_REV && num_ent != CPPC_V4_NUM_ENT) ||
+	    (cpc_rev > CPPC_V4_REV && num_ent <= CPPC_V4_NUM_ENT)) {
 		pr_debug("Unexpected number of _CPC return package entries (%d) for CPU:%d\n",
 			 num_ent, pr->id);
 		goto out_free;
 	}
-	if (cpc_rev > CPPC_V3_REV) {
-		num_ent = CPPC_V3_NUM_ENT;
-		cpc_rev = CPPC_V3_REV;
+	if (cpc_rev > CPPC_V4_REV) {
+		num_ent = CPPC_V4_NUM_ENT;
+		cpc_rev = CPPC_V4_REV;
 	}
 
 	cpc_ptr->num_entries = num_ent;
@@ -845,6 +846,16 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 
 			cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
 			memcpy(&cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].cpc_entry.reg, gas_t, sizeof(*gas_t));
+		} else if (cpc_obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE && (i - 2) == RESOURCE_PRIORITY) {
+			/*
+			 * ACPI 6.6, s8.4.6.1.2.7 defines Resource Priority as a
+			 * Package of Resource Priority Register Descriptor sub-packages.
+			 * Parsing the full structure is not yet supported.
+			 * Mark the register as unsupported for now.
+			 */
+			pr_debug("CPU:%d Resource Priority not supported\n", pr->id);
+			cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+			cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].cpc_entry.int_value = 0;
 		} else {
 			pr_debug("Invalid entry type (%d) in _CPC for CPU:%d\n",
 				 i, pr->id);

include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h

@@ -17,16 +17,18 @@
 #include <acpi/pcc.h>
 #include <acpi/processor.h>
 
-/* CPPCv2 and CPPCv3 support */
+/* CPPCv2, CPPCv3 and CPPCv4 support */
 #define CPPC_V2_REV	2
 #define CPPC_V3_REV	3
+#define CPPC_V4_REV	4
 #define CPPC_V2_NUM_ENT	21
 #define CPPC_V3_NUM_ENT	23
+#define CPPC_V4_NUM_ENT	25
 
 #define PCC_CMD_COMPLETE_MASK	(1 << 0)
 #define PCC_ERROR_MASK		(1 << 2)
 
-#define MAX_CPC_REG_ENT 21
+#define MAX_CPC_REG_ENT 23
 
 /* CPPC specific PCC commands. */
 #define	CMD_READ 0
@@ -109,6 +111,8 @@ enum cppc_regs {
 	REFERENCE_PERF,
 	LOWEST_FREQ,
 	NOMINAL_FREQ,
+	OSPM_NOMINAL_PERF,
+	RESOURCE_PRIORITY,
 };
 
 /*