Skip to content

Commit 1628b25

Browse files
author
Peter Zijlstra
committed
sched: Add blocked_donor link to task for smarter mutex handoffs
Add link to the task this task is proxying for, and use it so the mutex owner can do an intelligent hand-off of the mutex to the task that the owner is running on behalf. [jstultz: This patch was split out from larger proxy patch] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260512025635.2840817-8-jstultz@google.com
1 parent 4c2a204 commit 1628b25

5 files changed

Lines changed: 75 additions & 8 deletions

File tree

include/linux/sched.h

Lines changed: 7 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1250,6 +1250,13 @@ struct task_struct {
12501250
struct mutex *blocked_on; /* lock we're blocked on */
12511251
raw_spinlock_t blocked_lock;
12521252

1253+
/*
1254+
* The task that is boosting this task; a back link for the current
1255+
* donor stack. Set in schedule() -> find_proxy_task() and only stable
1256+
* under preempt_disable().
1257+
*/
1258+
struct task_struct *blocked_donor;
1259+
12531260
#ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK_BLOCKER
12541261
/*
12551262
* Encoded lock address causing task block (lower 2 bits = type from

init/init_task.c

Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ struct task_struct init_task __aligned(L1_CACHE_BYTES) = {
200200
.mems_allowed_seq = SEQCNT_SPINLOCK_ZERO(init_task.mems_allowed_seq,
201201
&init_task.alloc_lock),
202202
#endif
203+
.blocked_donor = NULL,
203204
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
204205
.pi_waiters = RB_ROOT_CACHED,
205206
.pi_top_task = NULL,

kernel/fork.c

Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2224,6 +2224,7 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
22242224
lockdep_init_task(p);
22252225

22262226
p->blocked_on = NULL; /* not blocked yet */
2227+
p->blocked_donor = NULL; /* nobody is boosting p yet */
22272228

22282229
#ifdef CONFIG_BCACHE
22292230
p->sequential_io = 0;

kernel/locking/mutex.c

Lines changed: 53 additions & 7 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -981,15 +981,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ww_mutex_lock_interruptible);
981981
static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigned long ip)
982982
__releases(lock)
983983
{
984-
struct task_struct *next = NULL;
984+
struct task_struct *donor, *next = NULL;
985985
struct mutex_waiter *waiter;
986-
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
987986
unsigned long owner;
988987
unsigned long flags;
989988

990989
mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, ip);
991990
__release(lock);
992991

992+
/*
993+
* Ensures the proxy donor stack is stable across unlock and handoff.
994+
* Specifically, it avoids the case where current->blocked_donor is
995+
* NULL when it is inspected while doing the unlock, but a preemption
996+
* before taking the wake_lock would make it set and a hand-off is
997+
* missed.
998+
*/
999+
guard(preempt)();
9931000
/*
9941001
* Release the lock before (potentially) taking the spinlock such that
9951002
* other contenders can get on with things ASAP.
@@ -1002,6 +1009,12 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
10021009
MUTEX_WARN_ON(__owner_task(owner) != current);
10031010
MUTEX_WARN_ON(owner & MUTEX_FLAG_PICKUP);
10041011

1012+
if (sched_proxy_exec() && current->blocked_donor) {
1013+
/* force handoff if we have a blocked_donor */
1014+
owner = MUTEX_FLAG_HANDOFF;
1015+
break;
1016+
}
1017+
10051018
if (owner & MUTEX_FLAG_HANDOFF)
10061019
break;
10071020

@@ -1014,20 +1027,53 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
10141027
}
10151028

10161029
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
1030+
raw_spin_lock(&current->blocked_lock);
10171031
debug_mutex_unlock(lock);
1032+
1033+
if (sched_proxy_exec()) {
1034+
/*
1035+
* If we have a task boosting current, and that task was boosting
1036+
* current through this lock, hand the lock to that task, as that
1037+
* is the highest waiter, as selected by the scheduling function.
1038+
*/
1039+
donor = current->blocked_donor;
1040+
if (donor) {
1041+
struct mutex *next_lock;
1042+
1043+
raw_spin_lock_nested(&donor->blocked_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
1044+
next_lock = __get_task_blocked_on(donor);
1045+
if (next_lock == lock) {
1046+
next = get_task_struct(donor);
1047+
__set_task_blocked_on_waking(donor, next_lock);
1048+
current->blocked_donor = NULL;
1049+
}
1050+
raw_spin_unlock(&donor->blocked_lock);
1051+
}
1052+
}
1053+
1054+
/*
1055+
* Failing that, pick first on the wait list.
1056+
*/
10181057
waiter = lock->first_waiter;
1019-
if (waiter) {
1020-
next = waiter->task;
1058+
if (!next && waiter) {
1059+
next = get_task_struct(waiter->task);
10211060

1061+
raw_spin_lock_nested(&next->blocked_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
10221062
debug_mutex_wake_waiter(lock, waiter);
1023-
set_task_blocked_on_waking(next, lock);
1024-
wake_q_add(&wake_q, next);
1063+
__set_task_blocked_on_waking(next, lock);
1064+
raw_spin_unlock(&next->blocked_lock);
1065+
10251066
}
10261067

10271068
if (owner & MUTEX_FLAG_HANDOFF)
10281069
__mutex_handoff(lock, next);
10291070

1030-
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_wake(&lock->wait_lock, flags, &wake_q);
1071+
raw_spin_unlock(&current->blocked_lock);
1072+
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
1073+
if (next) {
1074+
wake_up_process(next);
1075+
put_task_struct(next);
1076+
}
10311077
}
10321078

10331079
#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC

kernel/sched/core.c

Lines changed: 13 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -6827,7 +6827,17 @@ static void proxy_migrate_task(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf,
68276827
* Find runnable lock owner to proxy for mutex blocked donor
68286828
*
68296829
* Follow the blocked-on relation:
6830-
* task->blocked_on -> mutex->owner -> task...
6830+
*
6831+
* ,-> task
6832+
* | | blocked-on
6833+
* | v
6834+
* blocked_donor | mutex
6835+
* | | owner
6836+
* | v
6837+
* `-- task
6838+
*
6839+
* and set the blocked_donor relation, this latter is used by the mutex
6840+
* code to find which (blocked) task to hand-off to.
68316841
*
68326842
* Lock order:
68336843
*
@@ -6969,6 +6979,7 @@ find_proxy_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *donor, struct rq_flags *rf)
69696979
* rq, therefore holding @rq->lock is sufficient to
69706980
* guarantee its existence, as per ttwu_remote().
69716981
*/
6982+
owner->blocked_donor = p;
69726983
}
69736984
WARN_ON_ONCE(owner && !owner->on_rq);
69746985
return owner;
@@ -7125,6 +7136,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(int sched_mode)
71257136
clear_task_blocked_on(prev, NULL);
71267137

71277138
rq_set_donor(rq, next);
7139+
next->blocked_donor = NULL;
71287140
if (unlikely(next->is_blocked && next->blocked_on)) {
71297141
next = find_proxy_task(rq, next, &rf);
71307142
if (!next) {

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)