[prompt-analysis] Copilot PR Prompt Analysis - 2026-03-16 #21180
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Copilot PR Prompt Pattern Analysis. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #21340. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Summary
Analysis Period: Last 30 days | Total PRs: 1,000 | Merged: 803 (80.4%) | Closed: 196 (19.6%) | Open: 1
This is an improvement over the prior week's 78.5% success rate (2026-03-11), continuing an upward trend from 74.4% in early January.
Prompt Categories and Success Rates
✅ Successful Prompt Patterns
Common characteristics in merged PRs:
fix(353),add(200),update(68),remove(53),refactor(35)fix:,feat:,chore:etc. with 84% success rate vs 79% for non-conventionalExample Successful PRs
PR #21174:
fix: update golden files for gh-aw-firewall v0.24.2 bump— Body describes exact failing test, specific version numbers, and precise change needed → MergedPR #21173:
chore: bump gh-aw-firewall default version to v0.24.2— Precise scope (pkg/constants/constants.go), named constant, exact version strings → MergedPR #21172:
refactor: extract shared flattenArtifactTree helper to remove duplicate flatten logic— Named 3 specific functions in a specific file, quantified the duplication (150 lines) → Merged❌ Unsuccessful Prompt Patterns
Common characteristics in closed PRs:
Example Unsuccessful PRs
PR #21143:
Completing task— Body: "Pull request created by AI Agent". No task description, no context, no specifics → ClosedPR #21113:
refactor: extract Daily Audit Discussion safe-output pattern into shared/daily-audit-discussion.md— Well-titled but referenced#[issue number](placeholder not filled in) → ClosedPR #21088:
Add /tctt slash command to block users via silent list— Scope may have been too broad or feature not aligned with current roadmap → ClosedKey Insights
fix:,feat:,chore:etc. yields 84% success vs 79% without — a 5-point advantage. This signals that scoped, intent-clear titles help reviewers quickly assess merit.Recommendations
Based on today's analysis:
fix:,feat:,chore:,refactor:in PR titles. They correlate with 5% higher merge rates.TestWasmGolden_CompileFixturesgolden snapshots" is stronger than "fix golden test".Closes #[issue number]— unfilled placeholders signal incomplete prompts.Historical Trends
Trend: Steady improvement over the last 2 weeks (+2.4 pts), reaching a new 30-day high of 80.4% today.
References: §23128931888
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions